Letter to the Editor

May 24, 2012 Open letter to incoming BISD Superintendent Timothy Chargois


I want to thank you for taking the time to visit (me) yesterday morning, (May 23). I think our meeting was productive and I hope you were left with a sense that it is our mutual and earnest desire to see BISD truly become one of the best school districts in the United States. Having vendors buy advertisements with companies or filling our surveys for newspapers in a shameless attempt at self-promotion or hanging banners on the administration building proclaiming that BISD is currently one of the best school districts in the country is intellectually dishonest, does not fool anyone and actually does more harm than good.

In a similar vein, the issue regarding the inclusion of your automatic raise provision in your newly signed contract as superintendent-elect does tremendous harm to your efforts to bring a fresh start to this school district. The community is aware that the Board of Trustees had a stated position prior to contract negotiations that the new superintendent would not have an automatic raise provision in his or her contract. The first draft of a contract that went out to the members of the board on March 28, 2012, specifically stated, “This contract contains no provision for an automatic salary increase.” How the final contract that was executed between yourself and the board managed to include the automatic salary provision is obviously a point of great conjecture and has only deepened and increased the distrust that much of the community has with regard to BISD administration and the BISD Board of Trustees.

You have the opportunity to restore a great deal of that trust!


As I mentioned to you, if you were to indicate to the Board of Trustees in an open board meeting that you were willing to rescind the offensive language in your contract that contains the automatic raise provision, you would make great strides in demonstrating to the community that you are a man of integrity and that you want to facilitate the mission of BISD, part of which is “to be the unifying force in the community.”

Even if the majority of the Board is now taking the position that you should keep the automatic raise provision in your contract (which I am told they are), just by making the offer to rescind the provision, you will elevate yourself in the eyes of much of this community. There is no downside for you if you make the offer to rescind the provision. If the board accepts your offer, then the language can be taken out of the contract and you can rest assured that the Board of Trustees will compensate you appropriately in accordance with your performance as provided by the remainder of the language in your contract. If you make the offer to take the language out of your contract and the majority of the Board of Trustees refuses to accept your offer and insists that the language requiring the automatic raise provision be left in your contract, it will speak more to their motives and leave them under a cloud of distrust and disgust, but you will be above the fray.

On the other hand, if you stand mute and do nothing or continue to take the position that you are subject to the will of the Board, then you will be viewed in the same position that much of the community currently views the Board of Trustees — with distrust and disgust. You certainly do not want to begin your administration under those circumstances.

Tom Neild and Mike Neil advocated hiring you because they said you were a man of integrity. It is always the right time to do the right thing. Your time to do the right thing is now. If you want to help take steps to start the mending process in BISD, you need to act. If you do nothing, then you will be facing an uphill struggle for the rest of your administration.

I am not going to release this letter publicly anytime soon because I want you to have the opportunity to talk to your advisors and family and whomever else you need to as you consider this important decision. However, if you take no action between now and the conclusion of the next board meeting, this letter will probably find its way into the public domain.

Sincerely yours,

Michael D. Getz




Beaumont is not a place to send your child to BISD schools. Everyone who has any grey matter knows this. The education is poor at best. Why do people move to Lumberton? DUH! Chargois is no different than Thomas, horse of the same colour.

You know GETZ there is a

You know GETZ there is a simplistic beauty to your logic. I envy it as I wish the world were, for me, not always so gray. If I were smart enough I would probably be able to express it in a mathematical formula: 1 + 1 =2, in this case maybe more like 1 - 1 = 0.

However, I am growing weary of the sometimes irrational demands being made on our superintendent-elect, Dr. Timothy Chargois, by some in our community who seem to have set up a standard of conduct and honor that I doubt anyone could live up to. The man has not even stepped into the job as superintendent of BISD and he is expected to act as Jesus Christ even though some of your "demands" are presently out of his hands, beyond the concern of his present job and above his present pay grade.

Honestly, you really have some nerve. I'm sure you noticed at the board meeting that Dr. Thomas still sat at the center of the BISD universe.

I am not going to second guess Dr. Chargois' actions, or even more pointless, the lack thereof at the present time. Nor am I going to take it as some kind of bellwether on his future conduct as the superintendent of BISD. Nor should anyone else.

I think patience, probably the greatest virtue of them all, is in order.

Change will come, though it may be gradual.

I ask the community to please give Dr. Chargois the opportunity to prove himself when he is finally able to so instead of making a bunch of meaningless demands and cheap shots when he is unable to do anything about them.




Good Job Mike


Some of these items should have been added to the survey the teachers of BISD were asked to take before school was out. It covered information that would be very helpful for the Board and the new superintendent to review. However, the pay raise for the superintendent was not included in the questions and ironically one question dealt with honesty of the administrators with the staff and the community involved with BISD decision making.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.